View this email in your browser

August 2026 Bellwether Trial Settlement Update

Dear Superintendent and Board Members,

This is a quick update regarding the recently reported social media litigation settlement involving Breathitt County School District in Kentucky, which was the first school-district bellwether case scheduled for trial in the federal multi-district litigation.

This bellwether settlement is a validation of schools’ theories of recovery, but it would be a mistake to use the numbers as a settlement value indicator; if a global settlement is reached, it will be materially smaller.

The Settlement

The first school district social media trial in the country was set to begin in mid-June, 2026.  According to documents obtained in recent open records requests, Breathitt County School District secured approximately $27 million in total settlements from the social media Defendants. The reported settlement amounts are:

• Meta / Facebook / Instagram: $9 million

• Snap / Snapchat: $8 million

• TikTok / ByteDance: $8 million

• YouTube / Alphabet / Google: $2.01 million

Attorney Client Privileged Communication - This correspondence contains litigation strategy and is intended for School District client viewing only and cannot be shared with the public or non-client School Districts. Please DO NOT share this letter in an open session of a school board meeting. Only do so in Executive Session.

Further information

The Details

This is an important development. It validates what school districts have been saying since the beginning of this litigation: schools are expending real and significant resources responding to student mental-health, behavioral, disciplinary, and learning issues that they allege have been knowingly created or worsened by the design and operation of social media platforms. The fact that these companies paid substantial sums to resolve the first federal school-district bellwether case confirms that these claims are serious, that the Defendants recognize meaningful litigation risk, and that school districts have a legitimate basis for seeking compensation for the costs they have been forced to bear. 

Grounding Expectations

At the same time, it is very important to keep expectations grounded. Breathitt should not be used as a benchmark for valuing other school district claims. Breathitt was an initial bellwether case, selected for early trial, litigated intensely, and resolved shortly before trial. That district has put thousands of hours into preparing its case for trial and took large financial risks. Early bellwether cases often involve unique facts, unusual and unique procedural leverage, extensive case-specific expert work, public scrutiny, and heightened trial risk. Defendants may pay a premium to resolve a first test case because it avoids the uncertainty of a public trial, limits the risk of an adverse verdict, and gives them more control over the broader litigation.

Importantly, we believe the Defendants paid a substantial premium to "buy time". By settling Breathitt, the Defendants avoided a school district trial until February 2027. If the Defendants had not settled, Meta would be finishing up phase 2 of its case being prosecuted by the NM Attorney General, start jury selection in a school district case this week, when the school district trial ended, they would then be in two more cases, one against the Tennessee Attorney General and the second personal injury case in Los Angeles, and then when those cases were over or maybe still going on, begin a case vs. four states’ Attorneys General in Oakland! For these reasons, we believe the Defendants had to pay whatever it took to get a little breathing room to get their trial teams and witnesses ready for the July and August onslaught of trials.

The Right Takeaway

For those reasons, while the Breathitt settlement is a positive signal, it is not a reliable formula for predicting future settlement values. If there is a broader settlement structure for school districts, we expect the numbers for most districts to be meaningfully lower than the initial Breathitt bellwether result. Future values will likely depend on many factors, including district size, student population, documented costs, state law, filing posture, timing of participation, the strength of district-specific evidence, appellate rulings, additional bellwether outcomes, and the Defendants’ willingness to buy global peace.

The right takeaway is this: the Breathitt settlement supports the core premise of the litigation and demonstrates that school-district claims have real value. But it should be viewed as an encouraging early data point, not as a settlement calculator.

The Path Forward

All eyes are on the next case events:

• Mid June- Closing arguments of phase 2 of the State Court New Mexico Attorney General trial vs Meta

• July- Los Angeles State Court Personal Injury trial v. Meta

• July- Tennessee State Court Attorney General trial v. Meta

• August- MDL Federal Court Consolidated Attorney General trial v. Meta, (California, Colorado, Kentucky, New Jersey)

• October- Texas State Court Attorney General trial v. TikTok

• February 2027- MDL Federal Court Next School District trial (Tucson ISD or Charleston ISD) 

Additional Reading

We have linked a recent NYT article on the litigation. It is an excellent summary and source of example documents plaintiffs have discovered in the litigation.

We will continue to evaluate developments carefully and communicate as they occur.

We encourage you to reach out with any questions or requests for clarification. Our priority is to ensure your district is well-prepared and fully informed as the case evolves. We will continue to advocate for your interests, collaborate closely with district counsel, and offer guidance on emerging requirements and opportunities.

Sincerely,